• Shock · Jan 2025

    Meta Analysis

    Use of muscular ultrasound to detect intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.

    • Bin Gu, Yu Zhou, Rui Shi, Shumin Miao, Fei Pei, Hao Yuan, Luhao Wang, Jean-Louis Teboul, Xiang Si, Xiangdong Guan, and Jianfeng Wu.
    • Therapeutics and Intensive Care Medicine, Paris-Saclay University Hospitals, Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France.
    • Shock. 2025 Jan 1; 63 (1): 192919-29.

    AbstractBackground : This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to detecting performance of muscular ultrasound for intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness (ICUAW). Methods : We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane library, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases for articles published before July 2024. A random-effects model was utilized to derive the summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Additionally, the sources of heterogeneity were explored by subgroup analysis and meta-regression. Results : This meta-analysis comprised 10 prospective studies involving 561 participants, of whom 241 (42.96%) were diagnosed as ICUAW. Overall, muscular ultrasound exhibited good performance for detecting ICUAW, with the area of summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve of 0.85 (95%CI 0.82-0.88), sensitivity of 0.76 (95%CI 0.70-0.81), specificity of 0.80 (95%CI 0.74-0.84), and DOR of 12.43 (95%CI 7.98-19.38). Upon predefined subgroup analysis, the rectus femoris exhibited significantly superior discriminatory ability in identifying ICUAW than the non-rectus femoris, with higher SROC (0.88 [95%CI 0.85-0.91] vs. 0.76 [95%CI 0.72-0.79], P < 0.01). Moreover, cross-sectional area was more effective than thickness, with higher specificity (0.86 [95%CI 0.80-0.91] vs. 0.74 [95%CI 0.68-0.79], P = 0.02) and SROC (0.89 [95%CI 0.86-0.92] vs. 0.76 [95%CI 0.72-0.80], P < 0.01). Furthermore, integrated analysis of these two indicators revealed that the cross-sectional area of rectus femoris was statistically superior to the thickness of rectus femoris, with higher sensitivity (0.82 [95%CI 0.74-0.87] vs. 0.75 [95%CI 0.65-0.83], P < 0.05) and AUC (0.91 [95%CI 0.88-0.93] vs. 0.80 [95%CI 0.76-0.83], P < 0.01). Conclusions : Muscular ultrasound could be a reliable tool for ICUAW detection. Compared with alternative indices, the cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris exhibits superior detection efficacy and may be considered as a valuable parameter for clinical application.Copyright © 2024 by the Shock Society.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…