• Gregory J R States, Trevor Clark, Darlene A Burke, Alice Shum-Siu, and MagnusonDavid S KDSKDepartment of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA..
• Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
• J. Neurotrauma. 2024 Oct 25.

AbstractMotorized cycling (MC) is utilized as an alternative to traditional exercise in individuals who are unable to perform voluntary movements post-spinal cord injury. Although rodent models of MC often show more positive outcomes when compared with clinical studies, the cause of this difference is unknown. We postulate that biomechanical differences between rats and humans may contribute to this discrepancy. To begin to test this theory, we examined pedal reaction forces and electromyography (EMG) of hindlimb muscles as a function of cycle phase and cadence in a rat model of MC. We found that higher cadences (≥30 RPM) increased EMG and force, with higher forces observed in animals with contusion injuries as compared with transections. To further investigate the forces, we developed a technique to separate rhythmic (developed with the motion of the pedals) from nonrhythmic forces. Rhythmic forces resulted from induced eccentric muscle contractions that increased (amplitude and prevalence) at higher cadences, whereas nonrhythmic forces showed the opposite pattern. Our results suggest that muscle activity during MC in rats depends on the stretch reflex, which, in turn, depends on the rate of muscle lengthening that is modulated by cadence. Additionally, we provide a framework for understanding MC that may help translate results from rat models to clinical use in the future.

3 keywords...

hide…