• Sarah MacCarthy, Austin H Johnson, J Mac DeLay, Mallie Froehlich, Chase Harless, and Marc N Elliott.
• From the Department of Health Behavior, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham.
• South. Med. J. 2024 Nov 1; 117 (11): 634639634-639.

ObjectivesThere are no statewide statistics regarding the health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) Alabamians. To fill this gap, we used data collected by the Southern Equality Research and Policy Center to compare Alabama with other southern US states regarding the health and well-being of LGBTQ+ people.MethodsWe tested for unadjusted differences between Alabama and other southern states using χ2 tests for dichotomous outcomes and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for ordinal outcomes. Multivariate logistic models predicted dichotomous outcomes from an Alabama indicator, a continuous rurality variable, and a racial and ethnic minority indicator to control for differences in rurality and racial and ethnic composition; multivariate linear regression was used to approximate the point estimate of adjusted differences.ResultsAlabama and other southern states had statistically similar and high levels of abuse, harassment, and poor mental and physical health. Alabamians lived in ZIP codes with somewhat higher rural-urban commuting area code rurality scores (AL 1.76; South 1.70; P = 0.036, where 1 is the most urban category). More than one-fourth of Alabama respondents reported experiencing self-harming behaviors; one-third reported suicidal ideation (33.1%); more than half reported anxiety disorders (57.6%); more than two-thirds reported being depressed (69.2%); and 25% to 75% experienced or feared emotional and physical abuse because of their identity. Multivariate adjusted results were generally similar to unadjusted results.ConclusionsAlabama LGBTQ+ populations, who live in more rural settings than in most prior studies, experience markedly poor outcomes.

14 keywords...

hide…