• Injury · Dec 2024

    A deep learning algorithm that aids visualization of femoral neck fractures and improves physician training.

    • Pengyi Xing, Li Zhang, Tiegong Wang, Lipeng Wang, Wanting Xing, and Wei Wang.
    • Department of Radiology, The 989th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistics Support Force, Luoyang, Henan Province, China.
    • Injury. 2024 Dec 1; 55 (12): 111997111997.

    PurposeMissed fractures are the most common radiologic error in clinical practice, and erroneous classification could lead to inappropriate treatment and unfavorable prognosis. Here, we developed a fully automated deep learning model to detect and classify femoral neck fractures using plain radiographs, and evaluated its utility for diagnostic assistance and physician training.Methods1527 plain pelvic and hip radiographs obtained between April 2014 and July 2023 at our Hospital were selected for the model training and evaluation. Faster R-CNN was used to locate the femoral neck. DenseNet-121 was used for Garden classification of the femoral neck fracture, while an additional segmentation method used to visualize the probable fracture area. The model was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for clinicians fracture detection in the diagnostic assistance and physician training experiments were determined.ResultsThe accuracy of the model for fracture detection was 94.1 %. The model achieved AUCs of 0.99 for no femoral neck fractures, 0.94 for Garden I/II fractures, and 0.99 for Garden III/IV fractures. In the diagnostic assistance study, the emergency physicians had an average accuracy of 86.33 % unaided and 92.03 % aided, sensitivity of 85.94 % unaided and 91.78 % aided, and specificity of 87.88 % unaided and 93.13 % aided in detecting fractures. In the physician training study, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the trainees for fracture classification were 81.83 %, 77.28 %, and 84.85 %, respectively, before training, compared with 90.65 %, 88.31 %, and 92.21 %, respectively, after training.ConclusionsThe model represents a valuable tool for physicians to better visualize fractures and improve training outcomes, indicating deep learning algorithms as a promising approach to improve clinical practice and medical education.Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.