• Lin Huang, Qiaobin Huang, Weiquan Ma, and Hong Yang.
• Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
• Shock. 2024 Nov 8.

AbstractThe reversal of microcirculation dysfunction is crucial for assessing the success of shock resuscitation and significantly influences patient prognosis. However hemodynamic incoherence is observed when microcirculatory dysfunction persists despite the restoration of macrocirculatory function post-resuscitation. Recent advancements in technology have enabled bedside assessment of microcirculation in shock patients, allowing for direct visualization of microcirculatory morphology and quantitative evaluation of its functional status. This article reviews the pathophysiological mechanisms that lead to hemodynamic incoherence. It also introduces the current understanding and classification framework for the different phenotypes of hemodynamic incoherence. Existing evidence indicates that the diverse mechanisms leading to microcirculatory disorders result in varied manifestations among patients experiencing hemodynamic incoherence, highlighting the heterogeneity of this population. Some classification frameworks have been proposed to enhance our understanding of these phenotypes. By integrating pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical symptoms, indicators of macrocirculation, microcirculation, tissue metabolism, and biomarkers, we can summarize certain clinical features of phenotypes in hemodynamic incoherence to form a conceptual framework. Additionally, strategies for creating targeted treatments based on different phenotypes require further validation.Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Shock Society.

14 keywords...

hide…