• J Bone Joint Surg Am · Jun 2008

    Risk factors in redisplacement of distal radial fractures in children.

    • Kadir Bahadir Alemdaroğlu, Serkan Iltar, Oğuzhan Cimen, Mehmet Uysal, Ender Alagöz, and Doğan Atlihan.
    • Department of Second Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ulucanlar Cad., 06340 Ankara, Turkey. balemdaroglu@yahoo.com.tr
    • J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jun 1;90(6):1224-30.

    BackgroundThe causes of redisplacement following closed treatment of distal metaphyseal radial fractures in children are still controversial. Various risk factors and radiographic indices have been suggested to predict redisplacement. The aims of this study were to prospectively identify the causes of redisplacement and to test the accuracy of previously described radiographic indices and our new method, the "three-point index."MethodsThis prospective study included seventy-five displaced or severely angulated distal radial fractures in seventy-four children under the age of fifteen years. Age, gender, initial complete displacement of the radius, an associated ulnar fracture, the accuracy of the reduction, the maximum degree of obliquity of the fracture line in the sagittal or coronal plane, and the distance to the physis were examined as possible risk factors. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to search for risk factors. We also calculated the cast index, padding index, Canterbury index, gap index, and three-point index on the radiographs of each reduction. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were calculated for each test.ResultsInitial complete displacement and the degree of obliquity of the fracture were the most important risk factors for redisplacement. Fractures that were completely displaced initially were 11.7 times more likely to redisplace than were angulated but incompletely displaced fractures. A 20 degree oblique fracture was 4.9 times more likely to redisplace and a 30 degree oblique fracture was 10.9 times more likely to redisplace than was a 0 degree true transverse fracture. The three-point index was superior to the other radiographic indices for predicting redisplacement, with a sensitivity of 94.7%, a specificity of 95.2%, a negative predictive value of 98.4%, and a positive predictive value of 85.7%. The gap index was the next-best measure, but it had a sensitivity of 63.2%, a specificity of 76.2%, a negative predictive value of 87.3%, and a positive predictive value of 44.4%.ConclusionsInitial complete displacement and the degree of obliquity of the fracture line are the dominant factors affecting redisplacement. Our new radiographic index, the three-point index, should be used to predict redisplacement and assess the quality of the cast treatment of these fractures.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.