• Medicine · Nov 2024

    Observational Study

    Application of ultrasound-guided inferior vena cava collapsibility measurement in volume assessment for patients undergoing single-shot spinal anesthesia in total hip arthroplasty.

    • Tao Yang, Chunyan Huang, Yulin Chen, and Xuemin Lei.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, Neijiang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Neijiang, Sichuan, China.
    • Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 8; 103 (45): e40363e40363.

    AbstractTo explore the value of ultrasound in volume assessment during the perioperative period of single-shot spinal anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty. A total of 100 patients undergoing elective surgery under spinal anesthesia at our hospital from January 2022 to January 2024 were selected. Transthoracic echocardiography was used to measure the diameter of the abdominal aorta (Ao) before anesthesia (T1), 10 minutes after anesthesia (T2), and 30 minutes after anesthesia (T3). The inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) and the ratio of IVCe to Ao (IVCe/Ao) were calculated. A volume load test was performed 10 minutes after anesthesia. Based on the increase in stroke volume (ΔSV) after the volume load test, patients were divided into a volume-responsive group (ΔSV ≥ 15%) and a volume-nonresponsive group (ΔSV < 15%). The reliability of inferior vena cava parameters in predicting hypotension after spinal anesthesia and the value in predicting volume responsiveness postanesthesia were evaluated using ROC curves. A total of 100 patients were enrolled, 18 were withdrawn, and a total of 82 patients were included. After the volume load test, the parameters of the volume response group and the volume nonresponse group were basically consistent, and the difference was not statistically significant (P > .05). The SV of volume reaction group was significantly higher than that of volume no reaction group (P < .05). The incidence of hypotension in the volume response group was higher than that in the non-volume response group (51.28% vs 11.63%, χ2 = 15.174, P < .01). The AUC for volume reactivity prediction using IVCe, IVCi, IVC-CI, and IVCe/Ao were 0.62, 0.71, 0.70, and 0.72, respectively. IVCi, IVC-CI, and IVCe/Ao were significant predictors of volume reactivity (P < .05). The AUC predicting persistent hypotension after spinal anesthesia using IVCe, IVCi, IVC-CI, and IVCe/Ao were 0.78, 0.79, 0.70, and 0.84, respectively. IVCe, IVCi, IVC-CI, and IVCe/Ao can predict volume reactivity before anesthesia. IVCi, IVC-CI, and IVCe/Ao predicted persistent hypotension in patients with spinal anesthesia after anesthesia, and IVCe/Ao showed the best predictive effect. Thus, IVCe/Ao is a reliable parameter for predicting persistent hypotension and assessing volumetric reactivity.Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.