• Neurochirurgie · Jul 2011

    [Long-term outcome of patients treated with spinal cord stimulation for therapeutically refractory failed back surgery syndrome: a retrospective study].

    • L Abeloos, O De Witte, R Riquet, T Tuna, and N Mathieu.
    • Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital Erasme, 808, route de Lennik, 1070 Bruxelles, Belgique. labeloos@ulb.ac.be
    • Neurochirurgie. 2011 Jul 1;57(3):114-9.

    Background And PurposeLong-term efficiency (>5 years) of spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome is poorly described in literature. The aims of our study were to evaluate the long-term efficiency and the quality of life of our series of patients with spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome.MethodsThe data of 55 patients implanted successively in our institution between 1995 and 2005 for failed back surgery syndrome were collected retrospectively. We contacted them for a telephone survey focused on efficiency, quality of life and treatment satisfaction.ResultsAn internal pulse generator was placed in 42 patients. Thirty-two of them were contacted to answer our survey with a mean follow-up of 8.3 years. Seventy-five percent of our population reported a pain decrease of greater or equal to 50%. The efficiency of percutaneous leads was reported as 50% for the quadripolars and 83% for the octopolars. The surgical leads evaluations were positive in 70% for 4 × 1 as well as for 4 × 2 leads. We observed a default of low back pain relief in 84% of patients with an incomplete pain relief (59%). The ability to sit, get out of the bed, and climb stairs increased in 75%. The walk was better in 82%. Decrease in drug consumption of greater or equal to 50% was observed in 66%.ConclusionsOur retrospective study demonstrates a satisfaction of 75% of the patients after 8.3-years follow-up. Spinal cord stimulation is an effective treatment for refractory failed back surgery syndrome.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.