• Atencion primaria · Nov 2024

    [Quality of care in university podiatry: Analysis of the patient satisfaction questionnaire].

    • Fátima Santalla Borreiros, Ramón González Cabanach, Manuel Romero-Soto, and Antonio Souto-Gestal.
    • Departamento de Ciencias da Saúde, Área de Enfermería (Podología), Universidade da Coruña, Ferrol, A Coruña, España.
    • Aten Primaria. 2024 Nov 15; 57 (5): 103138103138.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the validity and reliability of a patient satisfaction questionnaire designed to measure the quality of care in university podiatry clinics, and to analyze the perception of care quality in this teaching-assistance setting.DesignDescriptive cross-sectional observational study.SettingUniversity Podiatry Clinic at the University of A Coruña (CUP-UDC), Spain.ParticipantsThree hundred and fifteen adult users capable of completing a questionnaire on podiatric care quality, selected through consecutive sampling. The rejection rate was 4.3%.InterventionsThe "Quality of care in the clinical area of podiatry questionnaire" was used, specifically designed to measure the quality of care in university podiatry clinics. It evaluated clinical aspects, information, administration, facilities, timing, and accessibility on a 5-point Likert scale. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient.ResultsThe overall mean score was 4.48±0.34 ("Good"). Factor analysis revealed six dimensions instead of the original five, suggesting a more valid structure. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha of 0.881). The best-rated factors were "Care", "Procedures" and "Clinical aspects".' Item correlations showed some differences from the original study, highlighting a strong correlation between care received and staff friendliness.ConclusionsThe results indicate high satisfaction with care at CUP-UDC. The analyzed instrument proved to be valid and reliable for assessing care quality in the university podiatry setting from the service user's perspective. The new factor structure provides a more detailed view of the factors influencing care quality, offering valuable information to improve clinical practice and podiatry training.Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Publicado por Elsevier España S.L.U. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…