• Sanjit S Jolly, Marc-André d'Entremont, Bertram Pitt, Shun Fu Lee, Rajibul Mian, Jessica Tyrwhitt, Sasko Kedev, Gilles Montalescot, Jan H Cornel, Goran Stanković, Raul Moreno, Robert F Storey, Timothy D Henry, Shamir R Mehta, Matthias Bossard, Petr Kala, Ravinay Bhindi, Biljana Zafirovska, P J Devereaux, John Eikelboom, John A Cairns, Madhu K Natarajan, J D Schwalm, Sanjib K Sharma, Wadea Tarhuni, David Conen, Sarah Tawadros, Shahar Lavi, Valon Asani, Dragan Topic, Warren J Cantor, Olivier F Bertrand, Ali Pourdjabbar, Salim Yusuf, CLEAR investigators, and CLEAR Investigators.
• Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
• N. Engl. J. Med. 2025 Feb 13; 392 (7): 643652643-652.

BackgroundMineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have been shown to reduce mortality in patients after myocardial infarction with congestive heart failure. Whether routine use of spironolactone is beneficial after myocardial infarction is uncertain.MethodsIn this multicenter trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned patients with myocardial infarction who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention to receive either spironolactone or placebo and either colchicine or placebo. The results of the spironolactone trial are reported here. The two primary outcomes were a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or new or worsening heart failure, evaluated as the total number of events; and a composite of the first occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke, new or worsening heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. Safety was also assessed.ResultsWe enrolled 7062 patients at 104 centers in 14 countries; 3537 patients were assigned to receive spironolactone and 3525 to receive placebo. At the time of our analyses, the vital status was unknown for 45 patients (0.6%). For the first primary outcome, there were 183 events (1.7 per 100 patient-years) in the spironolactone group as compared with 220 events (2.1 per 100 patient-years) in the placebo group over a median follow-up period of 3 years (hazard ratio adjusted for competing risk of death from noncardiovascular causes, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 1.21; P = 0.51). With respect to the second primary outcome, an event occurred in 280 of 3537 patients (7.9%) in the spironolactone group and 294 of 3525 patients (8.3%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio adjusted for competing risk, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.13; P = 0.60). Serious adverse events were reported in 255 patients (7.2%) in the spironolactone group and 241 (6.8%) in the placebo group.ConclusionsAmong patients with myocardial infarction, spironolactone did not reduce the incidence of death from cardiovascular causes or new or worsening heart failure or the incidence of a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new or worsening heart failure. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03048825.).Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.

36 keywords...

hide…