• Intern Emerg Med · Nov 2024

    Added value of inflammatory markers to vital signs for predicting mortality in patients with suspected infection: external validation and model development.

    • Toshihiko Takada, Jeroen Hoogland, Kotaro Fujii, Masataka Kudo, Sho Sasaki, Tetsuhiro Yano, Yu Yagi, Ryuto Fujiishi, MoonsKarel G MKGMJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Stratenum 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands., and Shunichi Fukuhara.
    • Department of General Medicine, Shirakawa Satellite for Teaching And Research (STAR), Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan. T.Takada@umcutrecht.nl.
    • Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 20.

    AbstractIt is crucial to identify high-risk patients with infectious conditions for appropriate management. We previously found that inflammatory markers added value to vital signs for predicting mortality in patients with suspected infection. In this study, the aim was to externally validate the added value of the inflammatory markers and to develop a new prediction model. For the external validation, consecutive adult patients with suspected infection admitted to the department of general medicine at two acute care hospitals were evaluated. A prognostic model for 30-day in-hospital mortality based on vital signs (systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, and mental status) was compared with an extended model that also included four inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, mean platelet volume, and red cell distribution width). Similar to the previous finding, all inflammatory markers except C-reactive protein showed significant contributions. Subsequently, a prediction model was developed using vital signs and markers with significant added value using a dataset that combined the external validation data with the data of the previous study. The new model was compared with a model based on the quick Sequential (sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score. The newly developed model showed a higher c-index than the qSOFA model [0.756 (95% CI 0.726-0.786) vs. 0.663 (0.630-0.696), p < 0.001]. Using the new model, 9.0% of patients who died were correctly reclassified compared with the qSOFA model at the threshold of 10% mortality risk. The new model including these markers showed potential to outperform the qSOFA model.© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Società Italiana di Medicina Interna (SIMI).

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…