• World Neurosurg · Dec 2024

    Review

    Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and shunt complications per valve type: a meta-analysis of proportions.

    • James Kelbert, Kristin Nosova, Ashley Kern, Rachel Russell, Annie Pico, James Mamaril-Davis, Amna Hussein, Ganesh Murthy, Giovanni Barbagli, and Robert W Bina.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Electronic address: jkelbert@arizona.edu.
    • World Neurosurg. 2024 Dec 6; 194: 123450123450.

    BackgroundIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is classically recognized by the triad of gait disturbance, cognitive dysfunction, and urinary incontinence. Since ventricular shunting may be affected by valve type, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between valve characteristics and outcomes.MethodsEnglish language studies that reported valve types, outcomes, and associated complications were included. Data were extracted and analyzed using R, version 4.3.2.ResultsThirteen studies were included. With gravitational valves, meta-analysis yielded 0.04 [0.02, 0.07] for subdural effusions (SDEs), 0.00 [0.00, 0.00] for surgical SDEs, 0.06 [0.03, 0.09] for proximal revisions, and 0.06 [0.03, 0.09] for distal. With differential pressure valves (DPVs) with antisiphon control, meta-analysis showed an incidence of 0.10 [0.07, 0.13] for SDEs, 0.02 [0.01, 0.04] for surgical SDEs, 0.03 [0.01, 0.05] for proximal and 0.04 [0.02, 0.07] for distal revisions. With DPVs without antisiphon control, there was an incidence of 0.17 [0.11, 0.23] for SDEs, 0.11 [0.06, 0.19] for surgical SDEs, 0.00 [0.00, 0.02] for proximal shunt revisions, and 0.05 [0.02, 0.10] for distal shunt revisions. With flow regulated valves, there was an incidence of 0.05 [0.01, 0.12] for SDEs, 0.01 [0.00, 0.05] for surgical SDEs, 0.06 [0.02, 0.11] for proximal revisions, and 0.01 [0.00, 0.05] for distal.ConclusionsGravitational valves and NPVs are associated with fewer SDEs while DPVs with and without ASDs are associated with more while there were no differences in proximal or distal revisions.Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.