• Andrew G Miller, Katlyn L Burr, John S Emberger, Carl R Hinkson, Cheryl A Hoerr, Jerin Juby, Karsten J Roberts, Brian J Smith, Shawna L Strickland, and Kyle J Rehder.
• Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and Respiratory Care Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. Andrew.g.miller@duke.edu.
• Respir Care. 2024 Nov 19.

BackgroundRespiratory care departments are experiencing an increased need to demonstrate value in the care they deliver. Value efficiency is a concept that incorporates the value of individual treatments into the normal operations of a department. The purpose of this study was to describe respiratory care leaders' attitudes about the value of services provided by respiratory care departments.MethodsAn electronic survey was distributed via social media, professional networks, and a manager work group. The survey was targeted to directors, managers, and supervisors of respiratory care departments. We asked questions related to value, services, and barriers to implementation of value efficiency. Data analysis was descriptive.ResultsWe received 116 responses; 86% were from managers or directors. The 5 most valuable services delivered were invasive mechanical ventilation (82%), noninvasive ventilation or CPAP (71%), protocol-driven care (47%), code team (44%), and rapid response team (41%). The 5 least valuable services delivered by respiratory care departments were electrocardiograms (63%), stress testing (44%), lung expansion therapies (41%), sleep studies staffed by the respiratory care department (36%), and smoking cessation education (36%). The primary barrier to value efficiency was physician prescribing practices (68%). There was general agreement that physicians support respiratory therapy protocols (71%), value should be considered when evaluating respiratory care services (95%), and directing resources to more valuable services if possible (73%). Respondents did not agree that hospital administrators understand respiratory therapy workflow and full-time equivalent needs (35%) nor that hospital administrators would be supportive if we reduced services (18%).ConclusionsIn a small sample of respiratory therapy leaders, there was limited consensus on what respiratory care services are the most and least valuable. Lack of consensus on high- and low-value services and physician prescribing practice were the primary barriers to value efficiency. Nearly all respondents felt value should be considered when evaluating respiratory care services.Copyright © 2024 by Daedalus Enterprises.

6 keywords...

hide…