• J Pain Symptom Manage · Nov 2024

    Large language models to identify advance care planning in patients with advanced cancer.

    • Nicole D Agaronnik, Joshua Davis, Christopher R Manz, James A Tulsky, and Charlotta Lindvall.
    • Harvard Medical School (N.A., C.M., J.T., C.L.), Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (N.A., C.M., J.T., C.L.), Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
    • J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Nov 24.

    ContextEfficiently tracking Advance Care Planning (ACP) documentation in electronic heath records (EHRs) is essential for quality improvement and research efforts. The use of large language models (LLMs) offers a novel approach to this task.ObjectivesTo evaluate the ability of LLMs to identify ACP in EHRs for patients with advanced cancer and compare performance to gold-standard manual chart review and natural language processing (NLP).MethodsEHRs from patients with advanced cancer followed at seven Dana Farber Cancer Center (DFCI) clinics in June 2024. We utilized GPT-4o-2024-05-13 within DFCI's HIPAA-secure digital infrastructure. We designed LLM prompts to identify ACP domains: goals of care, limitation of life-sustaining treatment, hospice, and palliative care. We developed a novel hallucination index to measure production of factually-incorrect evidence by the LLM. Performance was compared to gold-standard manual chart review and NLP.Results60 unique patients associated with 528 notes were used to construct the gold-standard data set. LLM prompts had sensitivity ranging from 0.85 to 1.0, specificity ranging from 0.80 to 0.91, and accuracy ranging from 0.81 to 0.91 across domains. The LLM had better sensitivity than NLP for identifying complex topics such as goals of care. Average hallucination index for notes identified by LLM was less than 0.5, indicating a low probability of hallucination. Despite lower precision compared to NLP, false positive documentation identified by LLMs was clinically-relevant and useful for guiding management.ConclusionLLMs can capture ACP domains from EHRs, with sensitivity exceeding NLP methods for complex domains such as goals of care. Future studies should explore approaches for scaling this methodology.Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.