• Am J Emerg Med · Feb 2025

    Factors associated with emergency department methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus coverage in patients with skin and soft tissue infections in an urban, tertiary care emergency department.

    • Brady Simpson, Kevin Han, Steven Yee, Rasha Alsaadawi, Roy Sabo, Taruna Aurora, and Joseph Lykins.
    • School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
    • Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 1; 88: 495649-56.

    IntroductionSkin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are common and contribute significantly to morbidity and healthcare costs in emergency departments (EDs). The rise of antimicrobial resistance, particularly due to community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), complicates treatment decisions. Objective physical examination findings suggesting need for empiric MRSA coverage are sometimes ignored. Improving initial antimicrobial selection in the ED, especially regarding MRSA, could enhance antimicrobial stewardship.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of patient records for those who presented with SSTIs to an urban tertiary care ED between January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. Patients admitted during their initial visit were excluded. Data collected included demographics, vital signs, and laboratory results. Logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with the decision to provide MRSA coverage at presentation, reporting odds ratios with 95 % confidence intervals.ResultsAmong 1675 patients, 42.2 % received empiric MRSA coverage. Factors associated with MRSA coverage included male gender, white race, intravenous drug use, immunocompromised status, systemic symptoms, tachycardia, presence of abscess, and surgical consultation. After adjusting for confounders, male gender, history of intravenous drug use, immunocompromised status, systemic symptoms, tachycardia, surgical consultation, and recent antibiotic use remained significantly associated.ConclusionSeveral factors, not always aligned with clinical guidelines, influenced the decision to initiate MRSA coverage in the ED. Understanding these determinants may improve antimicrobial stewardship and reduce costs. Future research should focus on patient outcomes based on methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) versus MRSA coverage decisions and educational initiatives to improve guideline compliance.Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,704,841 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.