-
- Pulakesh Upadhyaya, Jeffrey Wang, Daniel T Mathew, Ayman Ali, Simon Tallowin, Eric Gann, Felipe A Lisboa, Seth A Schobel, Eric A Elster, Timothy G Buchman, Christopher J Dente, and Rishikesan Kamaleswaran.
- Department of Surgery, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
- Shock. 2024 Nov 18.
BackgroundPatients with sepsis-induced hypotension are generally treated with a combination of intravenous fluids and vasopressors. The attributes of patients receiving a liberal compared to a restrictive fluid strategy have not been fully characterized. We use machine learning (ML) techniques to identify key predictors of restrictive versus liberal fluids strategy, and the likelihood of receiving each strategy in distinct patient phenotypes.MethodsWe performed a retrospective observational study of patients at Emory University Hospital from 2014-2021 that were hypotensive, met Sepsis-3 criteria, and received at least 1 L of intravenous crystalloid fluids. We excluded patients with non-septic etiologies of hypotension. Supervised ML techniques were used to identify key predictors for the two strategies. Additionally, subset analyses were performed on patients with pneumonia, congestive heart failure (CHF), or chronic kidney disease (CKD). Using unsupervised ML techniques, we also identified three distinct sepsis-induced hypotension phenotypes and evaluated their likelihood of receiving either strategy.ResultsWe identified N = 15292 patients and randomly split them into training (N = 12233) and validation (N = 3059) datasets. XGBoost was the most accurate model (AUC:0.84) for predicting the strategies. While worse oxygenation was the strongest predictor of utilizing a restrictive fluid strategy, top predictors of a liberal fluid strategy included higher pulse and blood urea nitrogen. In subset analyses, CHF, CKD and pneumonia were predictive of restrictive fluid strategy. We identified three distinct sepsis-induced hypotension phenotypes; 1) mild organ injury; 2) severe hypoxemia; and 3) renal dysfunction.ConclusionsWe identified key predictors of restrictive versus liberal fluids strategy and distinct patient phenotypes for sepsis-induced hypotension.Copyright © 2024 by the Shock Society.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.