• J Gen Intern Med · Sep 2018

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Partners and Alerts in Medication Adherence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    • Judd B Kessler, Andrea B Troxel, David A Asch, Shivan J Mehta, Noora Marcus, Raymond Lim, Jingsan Zhu, William Shrank, Troyen Brennan, and Kevin G Volpp.
    • Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. judd.kessler@wharton.upenn.edu.
    • J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1; 33 (9): 153615421536-1542.

    BackgroundPoor medication adherence is common and limits the effectiveness of treatment.ObjectiveTo investigate how social supports, automated alerts, and their combination improve medication adherence.DesignFour-arm, randomized clinical trial with a 6-month intervention.ParticipantsA total of 179 CVS health employees or adult dependents with CVS Caremark prescription coverage, a current daily statin prescription, a medication possession ratio less than 80%, and Internet access.InterventionsParticipants were randomly assigned to control, social support (partner), automated adherence alert messages (alert), or both social support and alerts (partner + alert). Participants in the social support arms were asked to name a medication adherence partner (MAP) to help them take their medication. Participants in the alert arms were sent emails, text messages, or automated phone calls if they had failed to adhere on the previous day and on one or both of the 2 days before that. In partner + alert, both participants and fully enrolled MAPs received alerts.Main MeasuresAdherence measured by wireless pill bottle opening.Key ResultsCompared to 36.0% adherence in control, adherence was significantly greater in the alert arm (52.9%, difference vs. control of 17.0%, 95% CI for difference 6.3 to 27.6%, P = 0.002) and the partner + alert arm (54.5%, difference vs. control of 18.6%, 95% CI for difference 6.6 to 30.5%, P = 0.003). Adherence in the partner arm was not statistically significantly greater than control (43.2%, difference vs. control of 7.2%, 95% CI of difference - 5.2% to 19.5%, P = 0.25). There were no statistically significant differences among the three treatment arms. Fewer participants invited a MAP in the partner + alert arm than the partner arm (P = 0.02).ConclusionsAutomated alerts were effective at improving medication adherence. Assigning a medication adherence partner did not statistically significantly affect adherence rates.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Number NCT01890018 [ https://clinicaltrials.gov /].

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.