-
- Stephen C Davis, Joel Gil, Michael Solis, Ryan Strong, and Roger Cassagnol.
- Dr. Philip Frost Department of Dermatology & Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
- Mil Med. 2024 Dec 13.
IntroductionWounds are colonized frequently by heterogeneous microflora. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) and Staphylococcus aureus (SA) are two of the most isolated bacterial species from wounds, and both typically form highly organized biofilms. Nitric oxide (NO) is a short-lived, diatomic, lipophilic gas with antimicrobial activity. Recently, NO and its derivatives have been shown to exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against bacteria, viruses, and parasites.Materials And MethodsP. aeruginosa strain ATCC 27312 or military isolate PA09-010 were combined with methicillin-resistant S. aureus strain MRSA USA300 to demonstrate the ability of NO to reduce polymicrobial infections in a porcine wound infection model. Deep partial-thickness wounds (10 mm × 7 mm × 0.5 mm) were made on four animals using a specialized electrokeratome. Wounds were inoculated with MRSA USA300 combined with PA09-010 in three animals and MRSA USA300 combined with PA27312 in one animal, then wounds were covered with polyurethane film dressings. After 48 hours, three wounds were recovered for baseline enumeration. The remaining wounds were randomly assigned to treatment groups and treated once daily. The NO topical gels tested were combinations of two phases, ointment phases with various concentrations (2-20%) combined with hydrogels with fast or slow release kinetics. A 4-day study with microbiological recovery was conducted on day 4. A separate 7-day study was also conducted, with microbial burden assessed on day 7.ResultsThe largest efficacy against MRSA USA300 was observed for the NO formulation with 2% concentration and fast release kinetics. This treatment reduced the MRSA USA300 bacterial count by more than 99.97% and 99.95% from baseline in wounds co-infected with PA09-010 and PA 27312, respectively, at day 7. Treatments showed a minimal efficacy against PA27312 and PA09-010 strains in both assessment times. MRSA USA300 was reduced to a lesser extent when it was combined with PA27312 as compared to PA09-010.ConclusionsThese studies demonstrate that NO-releasing topical formulations effectively reduce the MRSA burden in established biofilms composed of multiple microorganisms. Minimal efficacy against PA was observed. It has been demonstrated that MRSA bioburden is significantly reduced when inoculated together with P. aeruginosa. A better understanding of mechanisms of host-bacteria interactions, in single or mixed species biofilms, may lead to the development of novel therapeutic approaches. Overall, NO offers a promising alternative treatment against MRSA in polymicrobial infections.© The Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site–for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.