• Bmc Med · Dec 2024

    Strength of clinical evidence supporting the United States Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approvals from 2015 to 2022.

    • Xiaofang Zhang, Carl C Peck, Yaning Wang, Thomas D Szucs, Wan Sun, Xue Bai, Siyu Chen, Fengzhi Wang, and Yangfeng Wu.
    • Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
    • Bmc Med. 2024 Dec 18; 22 (1): 587587.

    BackgroundThe Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s Accelerated Approval (AA) pathway has increasingly used to authorize market approval of new drugs amid controversy. The present study aims to inform the most recent data on the strength of clinical evidence supporting such approvals.MethodsEvidentiary characteristics of pre-approval pivotal clinical studies and regulator-required post-approval confirmatory studies supporting AAs between 2015 and 2022 were extracted from publicly available FDA documents. Descriptive analyses were conducted for each of the characteristic including study design, study phase, primary endpoint, number of participants, and magnitude of effect. Trends of these characteristics over time were documented and accounted for class of drugs, application type, novelty, orphan status, and oncology/non-oncology indications.ResultsDuring 2015-2022, 156 drug-indication pairs received AA. To support these AAs, 77% of pre-approval pivotal trials employed single-arm designs, and 22% were phase I trials, with a median of 92 participants (IQR, 45-125); 61% of post-approval confirmatory studies were required by FDA to use randomized controlled design, 25% to use clinical endpoints, and 33% specified the number of participants requirement. During the 8-year observation period, the pairs approved via AA pathway almost tripled from 20 (2015-2016) to 59 (2019-2020) and fell to 36 (2021-2022); the corresponding proportion to all new drug approvals showed the same trend. Single-arm pre-approval pivotal studies increased from 55% (2015-2016) to 91% (2019-2020) and fell to 69% (2021-2022), while the median number of participants decreased from 106 (2015-2016) to 59 (2019-2020) and rose to 106 (2021-2022). Randomized controlled post-approval confirmatory studies decreased from 75% (2015-2016) to 42% (2019-2020) and rebounded to 75% (2021-2022), while those using surrogate endpoints increased from 50% (2015-2016) to 72% (2021-2022). Analyses adjusting for drug class, application type, novelty, orphan status, and oncology/non-oncology showed similar results.ConclusionsThe number of drug-indication pairs receiving AA increased sharply during 2015-2016 to 2019-2020 but fell in 2021-2022. Meanwhile, the strength of clinical evidence supporting FDA's AAs appeared to decline from 2015 to 2020 but seems to have improved in 2021-2022. Measures should be taken to further improve the strength of evidence in Accelerated Approvals.© 2024. The Author(s).

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.