• Nicolas Boulet, QuenotJean-PierreJPDepartment of Intensive Care, Burgundy University Hospital, Dijon, France.Lipness Team, INSERM Research Center LNC-UMR1231 and LabEx LipSTIC, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.INSERM CIC 1432, Clinical Epidemiology, University of Bu, Chris Serrand, Nadiejda Antier, Sylvain Garnier, Aurèle Buzancais, Laurent Muller, Claire Roger, Jean-Yves Lefrant, and Saber Davide Barbar.
• Division of Anesthesia, Critical Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, UR‑UM103 IMAGINE, University of Montpellier, Nimes University Hospital, Nîmes, France.
• Crit Care. 2024 Dec 21; 28 (1): 429429.

BackgroundIn septic shock, the classic fluid resuscitation strategy can lead to a potentially harmful positive fluid balance. This multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel, controlled pilot study assessed the effectiveness of a restrictive fluid strategy aiming to limit daily volume.MethodsPatients 18-85 years' old admitted to the ICU department of three French hospitals were eligible for inclusion if they had septic shock and were in the first 24 h of vasopressor infusion. Exclusion criteria were acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy, end stage chronic kidney disease, and severe malnutrition. Patients were electronically randomized 1:1 to either an optimized fluid restriction (reducing fluid intake as much as possible in terms of maintenance fluids and fluids for drug dilution during the first 7 days) or standard fluid strategy. The primary outcome was cumulative fluid balance (ml/kg) in the first 5 days. Patients and statisticians were blinded to group arm, but not clinicians.ResultsBetween September 2021 and February 2023, 1201 patients were screened and 50 included, with two in the control group withdrawing, thus 48 patients were analyzed (24 in each group). In the first 5 days, the optimized restrictive strategy and control groups received 89.7 (IQR 35; 128.9) and 114.3 (IQR 78.8; 168.5) ml/kg of fluid, respectively (mean difference: 35.9 ml/kg [0.0; 71.8], p = 0.0506). After 5 days, the median cumulative fluid balance was 6.9 (IQR - 13.7; 52.1) and 35.0 (IQR - 7.9; 40.2) ml/kg in the optimized restrictive strategy and control groups, respectively (absolute difference 13.2 [95%CI - 15.2; 41.6], p = 0.42). After 28 days, mortality and the numbers of days alive without life support were similar between groups. The main adverse events were severe hypernatremia in 1 and 2 patients in the fluid restriction strategy and control groups, respectively, and acute kidney injury KDIGO 3 in 4 and 7 patients in the fluid restriction strategy and control groups, respectively.ConclusionsIn ICU patients with septic shock, an optimized restrictive fluid strategy targeting hidden fluid intakes did not reduce the overall fluid balance at day 5. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04947904, registered on 1 July 2021.© 2024. The Author(s).

26 keywords...

hide…