-
- Alan M Jette.
- Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. ajette@bu.edu
- Am J Prev Med. 2003 Oct 1; 25 (3 Suppl 2): 122128122-8.
AbstractDespite the increased focus on disability as an important research outcome, there remains a need to improve disability instrumentation. This article discusses the need for improved operational differentiation in instruments used to assess disability outcomes. It details the challenge of clearly distinguishing between the concepts of function and disability in outcome instruments used in physical activity studies. The second issue in existing instruments is the limited precision to detect important changes in disability in response to physical activity interventions. Computer adaptive testing is discussed as a promising avenue for resolving the methodologic limitations inherent in existing outcome instruments. Priorities for future research that move the field forward in both of these areas are discussed.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.