• Rachel Dahan, Jeffry Borkan, Judith-Bell Brown, Shmuel Reis, Doron Hermoni, and Stewart Harris.
• Department of Family Medicine, The B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, The Technion Institute of Technology and Clalit Health Services Haifa and W G, Israel. mrdahan@netvision.net.il
• J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Aug 1; 13 (4): 616620616-20.

PurposeCurrent low back pain (LBP) clinical guidelines have helped to summarize the scientific evidence and research, but have failed to provide tools and guide family physicians (FPs). The purpose of this study is to identify barriers and facilitators for the implementation of LBP guidelines from family FPs' perspective.MethodsA qualitative focus group study of FPs in the north of Israel. Purposeful sampling was used to recruit participants, all of them board-certified FPs. Four focus groups were created, and discussions were taped, transcribed and analysed for major themes.ResultsFocus groups findings have expanded the understanding of the intellectual and mental challenges faced by Israeli FPs caring for LBP patients and highlighted the many obstacles to implementing LBP guidelines. Physicians' decision-making, pertaining to LBP, functions on three levels simultaneously: the physicians' agenda based on familiarity with the guidelines; their need to remain grounded in the context of the specific patient-doctor relationship; and the constraints and demands of the physician's workplace, medical system and environment.ConclusionsDespite an overall positive attitude towards LBP guideline implementation, FPs found it hard to come to terms with the conflicting dimensions of LBP patient care. The patient-doctor interaction determined the outcome of the encounter, whether it complied with the guidelines and whether the encounter leads to a healing process or to a vicious circle of unnecessary utilization of services.

19 keywords...

hide…