• Am J Emerg Med · Dec 2024

    Swift and Safe high-sensitive troPonin Evaluation in the Emergency Department with a 30-min protocol: The SPEED-30 cohort study.

    • Ahmet Enes Kucukardali, Zehra Boraci, Emre Kudu, Sinan Karacabey, Erkman Sanri, and Arzu Denizbasi.
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye; Department of Emergency Medicine, Defne Devlet Hastanesi, Hatay, Türkiye. Electronic address: enes.kucukardali@gmail.com.
    • Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Dec 12; 89: 303530-35.

    Study ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine whether myocardial infarction (MI) could be safely diagnosed or excluded within 30 min instead of 1 h.MethodsThis single-center, prospective, observational study included patients presenting with non-traumatic chest pain. Patients underwent a thorough evaluation, including medical history, physical exams, ECG, and serial hs-cTn T measurements at 0, 30, and 60 min. Patients were classified into STEMI or further evaluated for NSTEMI-ACS based on ECG results. The hs-cTn T tests placed patients into rule-in, observation, or rule-out groups. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) to rule out MI (primary endpoints) and specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) to rule in MI (secondary endpoints).Results809 patients were analyzed, with a median age of 53 ± 15.9 years, 36.1 % of whom were women. MI was confirmed in 15.6 % of patients. The 0-h/30-min algorithm placed 457 patients in the rule-out group, 222 in observation, and 188 in the rule-in, while the 0-h/1-h algorithm placed 507, 141, and 161 patients, respectively. The 0-h/30-min and 0-h/1-h algorithms showed identical sensitivity [100 % (96.11 %-100 %) and 100 % (99.61 %-100.00 %), respectively] and NPV [100 %] for excluding MI. Both had high specificity in the rule-in group [94.83 % (92.95 %-96.34 %) and 92.31 % (90.08 %-94.17 %)]. The 0-h/30-min algorithm had a superior PPV [71.54 % (64.75 %-77.48 %)] compared to the 0-h/1-h algorithm [66.46 % (60.53 %-71.91 %)].ConclusionThe 0-h/30-min algorithm is as effective as the 0-h/1-h algorithm in safely ruling out MI and may offer improved diagnostic efficiency in ruling in MI.Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.