• Clin Chem Lab Med · Jan 2005

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of methods for calculating serum osmolality: multivariate linear regression analysis.

    • Mehdi Rasouli and Kiarash Rezaei Kalantari.
    • Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Sciences University of Mazandaran, Sari, Iran. mehdi.rasouli@mazums.ac.ir
    • Clin Chem Lab Med. 2005 Jan 1;43(6):635-40.

    BackgroundThere are several methods for calculating serum osmolality, and their accordance with measured osmolality is the subject of controversy.MethodsThe concentrations of sodium, potassium, glucose, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and osmolalities of 210 serum samples were measured. Two empirical equations were deduced for the calculation of serum osmolality by regression analysis of the data. To choose the best equation, chemical concentrations were also used to calculate osmolalities according to our formulas and 16 different equations were taken from the literature and compared with the measured osmolalities. Correlation and linear regression analyses were performed using Excel and SPSS software.ResultsMultiple linear regression analysis showed that serum concentrations of sodium (beta = 0.778, p< or = 0.000), BUN (beta = 0.315, p < or = 0.000), glucose (beta = 0.0.089, p < or = 0.007) and potassium (beta = 0.109, p < or = 0.008) are strong predictors of serum osmolality. The data were also analyzed by manual linear regression to yield the equations: osmolality = 1.897[Na + ]+glucose+BUN+13.5, and osmolality = 1.90[Na+ + K+]+glucose+BUN+5.0. The osmotic coefficient for sodium and potassium solutes was deduced to be 0.949 from the slope of the curves of measured osmolality vs. [Na+] and [Na+ + K+], respectively. The inclusion of a BUN value in the equation for osmolality increased the correlation coefficient by approximately 450% and decreased the SD of difference by approximately 35% (p < or = 0.002). Inclusion of the osmotic coefficient for sodium solutes caused an underestimation of measured osmolality and positive osmolal gap unless an appropriate coefficient, constant value and/or the potassium value were included in the equation. The agreement was not improved when molal chemical concentrations were used instead of molar values. The formula presented by Dorwart and Chalmers gave inferior results to those obtained with our formulas.ConclusionsOur data suggest use of the Worthley et al. formula Osm = 2[Na +]+glucose+BUN for rapid mental calculation and the formulas of Bhagat et al. or ours for calculation of serum osmolality by equipment linked to a computer.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…