• Am J Emerg Med · Dec 2024

    The HET (history, electrocardiogram, and troponin) score has low efficacy and negative predictive value in a multisite U.S. cohort study.

    • Michael W Supples, Alexa G Dameron, Stephen Powell, Anna C Snavely, Nicklaus P Ashburn, Brandon R Allen, Robert H Christenson, R Gentry Wilkerson, Bryn E Mumma, Troy E Madsen, and Simon A Mahler.
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. Electronic address: mwsupple@wakehealth.edu.
    • Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Dec 15; 89: 151158151-158.

    IntroductionThe History, Electrocardiogram, and Troponin (HET) score is a simplified alternative to the HEART score for risk stratifying emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the HET score for 30-day cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI).MethodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of the STOP-CP multisite cohort study. Risk score components were determined prospectively by the treating provider. Patients were classified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk strata based on HEART and HET scores. Negative predictive value (NPV) was calculated for the primary safety outcome of cardiac death or MI at 30 days. Consistent with prior studies, the commonly accepted threshold of NPV ≥ 99 % was used to define safety. Efficacy was the proportion of patients classified as low risk. NPV and efficacy were compared between HET and HEART scores using generalized score statistic and McNemar's test, respectively.ResultsAmong 1460 patients, 46.3 % (676/1460) were women and the mean age was 57.6 ± 12.8 years. Cardiac death or MI at 30 days occurred in 12.7 % (186/1460). Among patients with a low-risk HET score, 1.4 % (4/286) experienced 30-day cardiac death or MI, while 2.2 % (12/534) of patients with a low-risk HEART score had 30-day cardiac death or MI. This yielded a NPV for 30-day of 98.6 % (95 % CI 96.5-99.6 %) for the HET score vs 97.8 % (95 % CI 96.1-98.8 %) for the HEART score (p = 0.29).Efficacy of the HET score was 19.6 % (286/1460, 95 % CI 17.6-21.6 %) vs 36.6 % (534/1460, 95 % CI 34.1-39.1 %) for the HEART score (p < 0.001).ConclusionIn a multisite US cohort study, neither the HET score nor the HEART score achieved a safe NPV. The HET score had significantly lower efficacy than the HEART score.Trial RegistrationHigh-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T to Optimize Chest Pain Risk Stratification (STOP-CP; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02984436; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02984436).Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.