• Chest · Dec 2024

    Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry (PRISm) Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    • Nicole M Robertson, Connor S Centner, Vickram Tejwani, Shakir Hossen, Dipan Karmali, Sibei Lu, and Trishul Siddharthan.
    • Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Center for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
    • Chest. 2024 Dec 30.

    BackgroundThe prevalence of chronic respiratory diseases is increasing globally. There is evidence that those with spirometric impairment, and no evidence of obstruction, termed preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), have increased risk of morbidity and mortality, compared to those with normal lung function. There remain several gaps in characterizing PRISm.Research QuestionsWhat is the prevalence, risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with PRISm globally?Study Design And MethodsIn this systematic review a comprehensive search using MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINHAL, and CENTRAL databases was conducted to include epidemiological studies with no language or data restrictions. Two reviewers independently screened citations and shortlisted full-text articles according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and data was extracted. Quality was assessed with the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool.Results52 studies met the inclusion criteria with 33 studies included in the meta-analysis. Pooled PRISm prevalence was 12% (95% CI: 0.10, 0.15) with greater prevalence in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared to high-income countries (19% vs. 11%). Comorbid diabetes was a significant risk factor associated with PRISm but data for female sex and smoking were mixed. PRISm was associated with increased all-cause (OR 1.41, 95% CI:1.08, 1.83, p=0.02), cardiovascular (OR 1.84, 95% CI:1.31, 2.58, p<0.01), and respiratory mortality (OR 1.82, 95% CI:1.08, 3.05, p=0.03). PRISm was not associated with a reduced lung cancer diagnosis (p=0.46). Quality assessment analysis revealed 34.6% (n=18) studies were rated "strong," 42.3% (n=22) "moderate," and 23.1% (n=12) "weak." Studies conducted LMICs had lower quality ratings.InterpretationIndividuals with PRISm have increased risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality. Recognizing and targeting modifiable PRISm risk factors may reduce the growing burden of PRISm and transition to obstructive lung disease globally. Additional studies are needed in LMICs that have unique risk factors a disease trajectory.Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,704,841 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.