-
- Shannon M Dunlay, Lindsey R Sangaralingham, Michelle A Lampman, Lorelle L Ziegelbauer, Jamie L Smith, Mikaela M Kall, Jami A Kinnucan, Keavy J Farris, Josh L Mattson, Colleen B Storino, and Conor G Loftus.
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (S.M.D.).
- Ann. Intern. Med. 2024 Dec 31.
BackgroundPatient-provider communication through the patient portal has markedly increased in recent years. Some health care facilities implemented programs to enable providers to bill for responding to patient-initiated messages that require substantive medical decision making through an e-visit.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of billing eligible patient-initiated portal messages as e-visits using a mixed-methods approach.DesignRetrospective observational pre-post comparison and prospective survey.SettingLarge integrated health system with sites in 4 U.S. states.ParticipantsPatients initiating portal message threads and health system providers completing an online survey.InterventionE-visit billing was implemented 18 August 2023.MeasurementsThe volume of patient-initiated medical advice message threads pre- versus postimplementation of e-visit billing was compared. Health system provider perceptions of e-visit billing were assessed using an online survey.ResultsIn the 6 months after e-visit billing implementation (18 August 2023 through 18 February 2024), the volume of patient-initiated medical advice message threads decreased by 8.8% (from 1 813 818 to 1 653 708) compared with the same dates the year prior (P = 0.002). A total of 5183 (0.3%) medical advice messages were billed. There was no difference in 7-day use of emergency services (emergency department visits or hospitalizations) in patients who proceeded with sending a message versus those that did not send a message after viewing the billing disclaimer on the patient portal. Providers reported overall acceptance of e-visit billing but expressed concerns about increased workload with the current process.LimitationCannot assess changes in other forms of contact, including telephone calls.ConclusionThese findings suggest that implementation of e-visit billing was associated with a modest decrease in patient-initiated portal message volume and was overall acceptable to providers in a large integrated health system.Primary Funding SourceNone.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.