• Bmc Med · Jan 2025

    Comparative Study

    Non-small cell lung cancer in ever-smokers vs never-smokers.

    • Jeremy R Burt, Naim Qaqish, Greg Stoddard, Amani Jridi, Parker Sage Anderson, Lacey Woods, Anna Newman, Malorie R Carter, Reham Ellessy, Jordan Chamberlin, and Ismail Kabakus.
    • Department of Radiology, Cardiothoracic Imaging, University of Utah, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, 50 N Medical Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA. radhopkins@hsc.utah.edu.
    • Bmc Med. 2025 Jan 5; 23 (1): 33.

    BackgroundLung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises 85% of cases with rising incidence among never-smokers (NS). This study seeks to compare clinical, imaging, pathology, and outcomes between NS and ever-smokers (S) NSCLC patients to identify significant differences if any.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of 155 NSCLC patients (88 S and 67 NS). The main predictor was smoking. Clinical, imaging, and pathology findings were evaluated at initial biopsy for staging. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was 12-month progression-free survival.ResultsImaging: NS and S had similar nodule size (0.81), calcification (> 0.99), and invasion of adjacent structures (> 0.99) (p values). NS slightly trended to more commonly involve the RLL vs S the RUL (p = 0.11). NS had higher numbers of extrathoracic metastases at initial biopsy for staging (p = 0.055).PathologyNS more commonly had adenocarcinoma compared to S, who had equal numbers of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.001). Rates of lymphovascular and pleural invasion were similar (p = 0.84 and 0.28). Initial staging: NS were more often initially diagnosed with stage IV disease (p = 0.046), positive nodal disease (p = 0.002), and metastatic disease (p = 0.004).OutcomesS had a non-significant trend toward worse 12-month progression-free survival (rate ratio = 1.31, p = 0.31; HR = 1.33, p = 0.28). NS and S had similar 1-year all-cause mortality (HR = 1.06, p = 0.90). S had nearly double the risk of all-cause mortality in 5 years (HR = 1.73, p = 0.056) and 10 years (HR = 1.77, p = 0.02). Median survival was 6.6 years for NS and 3.9 years for S, with NS surviving 2.7 years longer on average (p = 0.045).ConclusionsCT nodule features were similar in NS and S. NS more often had metastatic adenopathy, distant metastases, and stage IV disease at initial biopsy. Despite similar 12-month progression-free survival and 1-year all-cause mortality, S had nearly double the risk of mortality in the first 5 and 10 years post-diagnosis.Trial RegistrationRetrospectively registered.© 2025. The Author(s).

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…