• J Res Med Sci · Jan 2024

    Diagnostic accuracy of sino-nasal outcome test-22 and lund-kennedy endoscopic score for chronic rhinosinusitis in pre-bone marrow transplantation assessment.

    • Abolfazl Taheri, Arvin Shahzamani, and Mahboobe Asadi.
    • Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
    • J Res Med Sci. 2024 Jan 1; 29: 6767.

    BackgroundThe diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a crucial and challenging entity in bone marrow transplantation candidates. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score for the diagnosis of CRS in bone marrow transplantation candidates.Materials And MethodsWe conducted a single-center, observational study evaluating bone marrow transplantation candidates by paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) scan without contrast to measure the Lund Mackay score. Patients with a Lund Mackay score higher than or equal to four or with any evidence of sino-nasal fungus ball in their paranasal sinus CT were considered CRS. The Lund Kennedy endoscopic score and SNOT-22 were also calculated for all participants.ResultsThis study included 495 patients, of which 63 were diagnosed with CRS. Participants had a median age of 40 (30, 57) years old and 51.3% were male. The Lund Kennedy score and SNOT-22 were correlated with the Lund Mackay score. Furthermore, both SNOT-22 and Lund Kennedy scores were the predictors of CRS based on univariate logistic regression (odds ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.10 [1.06, 1.15], 1.37 [1.22, 1.56], respectively). Lund Kennedy score ≥1 had a sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.87) and a specificity of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.83) (AUC [95% CI]: 0.81 [0.75, 0.87]), while SNOT-22 did not yield a remarkable diagnostic accuracy.ConclusionThe Lund-Kennedy endoscopy score could diagnose CRS in bone marrow transplantation candidates with satisfactory accuracy, whereas SNOT-22 lacks enough accuracy to be employed as an independent sino-nasal assessment modality in these patients.Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Research in Medical Sciences.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.