• Medicina · Dec 2024

    Validity of Pleth Variability Index to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery in the Modified Prone Position.

    • Won Uk Koh, Dong-Ho Lee, Young-Jin Ro, and Hee-Sun Park.
    • Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea.
    • Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 7; 60 (12).

    AbstractBackground and Objective: The modified prone position, which is an alteration of the standard prone position, reduces cardiac preload. Dynamic variables including stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation (PPV), and pleth variability index (PVI) are reliable predictors for fluid responsiveness during surgery. To the best of our knowledge, no studies assessing dynamic variables for fluid responsiveness have been conducted in the modified prone position. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of PVI to predict fluid responsiveness in the modified prone position during cervical spine surgery. Materials and Methods: PVI, SVV, and PPV were recorded at the following times: before and after a 4 mL/kg crystalloid load in the supine position (T1, T2); after placement in the modified prone position (T3); and before and after a 4 mL/kg crystalloid administration in the modified prone position (T4, T5). Fluid responsiveness was defined as stroke volume (SV) ≥ 15%, assessed by the FloTrac/Vigileo™ (Edwards Lifesciences Corp, Irvine, CA, USA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were analyzed to identify changes in each dynamic variable that could predict fluid responsiveness in the modified prone position. Results: Data from a total of 43 subjects were analyzed. In the supine position, 21 subjects were responders. After subjects were placed in the modified prone position, SV significantly decreased, while PVI, SVV, and PPV significantly increased (p < 0.001 for all). In the modified prone position, 13 subjects were responders, and the areas under the ROC curves for ΔPVI, ΔSVV, and ΔPPV after fluid loading were 0.524 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.329-0.730, p = 0.476), 0.749 (95% CI 0.566-0.931, p = 0.004), and 0.790 (95% CI 0.641-0.938, p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: Crystalloid pre-loading could not mitigate the decrease in SV caused by the modified prone position. Changes in PVI were less reliable in predicting fluid responsiveness in the modified prone position.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…