-
Review Meta Analysis
The effect of tree nut, peanut, and soy nut consumption on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.
- Noushin Mohammadifard, Amin Salehi-Abargouei, Jordi Salas-Salvadó, Marta Guasch-Ferré, Karin Humphries, and Nizal Sarrafzadegan.
- From the Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center (NM and NS), the Hypertension Research Center (NM), Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Institute and the Food Security Research Center (AS-A), Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran; the Nutrition and Food Security Research Center (AS-A) and the Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Health (AS-A), Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran; the Human Nutrition Unit, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, IISPV, School of Medicine, Rovira i Virgili University, and CIBER Obesity and Nutrition, Reus, Spain (JS-S and MG-F); and Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (KH).
- Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015 May 1;101(5):966-82.
BackgroundAlthough several studies have assessed the effects of nut consumption (tree nuts, peanuts, and soy nuts) on blood pressure (BP), the results are conflicting.ObjectiveThe aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to estimate the effect of nut consumption on BP.DesignThe databases MEDLINE, SCOPUS, ISI Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for RCTs carried out between 1958 and October 2013 that reported the effect of consuming single or mixed nuts (including walnuts, almonds, pistachios, cashews, hazelnuts, macadamia nuts, pecans, peanuts, and soy nuts) on systolic BP (SBP) or diastolic BP (DBP) as primary or secondary outcomes in adult populations aged ≥18 y. Relevant articles were identified by screening the abstracts and titles and the full text. Studies that evaluated the effects for <2 wk or in which the control group ingested different healthy oils were excluded. Mean ± SD changes in SBP and DBP in each treatment group were recorded for meta-analysis.ResultsTwenty-one RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Our findings suggest that nut consumption leads to a significant reduction in SBP in participants without type 2 diabetes [mean difference (MD): -1.29; 95% CI: -2.35, -0.22; P = 0.02] but not in the total population. Subgroup analyses of different nut types suggest that pistachios, but not other nuts, significantly reduce SBP (MD: -1.82; 95% CI: -2.97, -0.67; P = 0.002). Our study suggests that pistachios (MD: -0.80; 95% CI: -1.43, -0.17; P = 0.01) and mixed nuts (MD: -1.19; 95% CI: -2.35, -0.03; P = 0.04) have a significant reducing effect on DBP. We found no significant changes in DBP after the consumption of other nuts.ConclusionsTotal nut consumption lowered SBP in participants without type 2 diabetes. Pistachios seemed to have the strongest effect on reducing SBP and DBP. Mixed nuts also reduced DBP.© 2015 American Society for Nutrition.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.