• Carl H Rose, Arij Faksh, Kyle D Traynor, Daniel Cabrera, Katherine W Arendt, and Brian C Brost.
• Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: rose.carl@mayo.edu.
• Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015 Nov 1; 213 (5): 653-6, 653.e1.

AbstractAlthough perimortem delivery has been recorded in the medical literature for millennia, the procedural intent has evolved to the current fetocentric approach, predicating timing of delivery following maternal cardiopulmonary arrest to optimize neonatal outcome. We suggest a call to action to reinforce the concept that if the uterus is palpable at or above the umbilicus, preparations for delivery should be made simultaneous with initiation of maternal resuscitative efforts; if maternal condition is not rapidly reversible, hysterotomy with delivery should be performed regardless of fetal viability or elapsed time since arrest. Cognizant of the difficulty in determining precise timing of arrest in clinical practice, if fetal status is already compromised further delay while attempting to assess fetal heart rate, locating optimal surgical equipment, or transporting to an operating room will result in unnecessary worsening of both maternal and fetal condition. Even if intrauterine demise has already occurred, maternal resuscitative efforts will typically be markedly improved following delivery with uterine decompression. Consequently we suggest that perimortem cesarean delivery be renamed "resuscitative hysterotomy" to reflect the mutual optimization of resuscitation efforts that would potentially provide earlier and more substantial benefit to both mother and baby.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

29 keywords...

hide…