• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg · Jan 2025

    Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcome after proximal hamstring tendon repair at mean 3 years follow-up.

    • Carlo Sgustav, Lucca Lacheta, Ulrich Stöckle, Doruk Akgün, Dominik Geisel, Hi-Un Park, Adrian Marth, and Suchung Kim.
    • Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. carlo.sgustav@charite.de.
    • Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jan 15; 145 (1): 130130.

    PurposeThe purpose of this study was to assess clinical and radiological outcome in patients after proximal hamstring tendon repair. We hypothesized that there is a significant correlation among subjective clinical outcome and interlimb asymmetries in muscle strength, fatty infiltration, and hamstring volume.MethodsThis retrospective monocentric case series included patients with surgical repair after proximal hamstring tendon rupture. Clinical outcome was assessed utilizing: Healthy Days Core Module (CDC HRQOL-4), numeric pain rating scale (NRS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), return to pre-injury activity level (RTPA), and patient satisfaction score. Postoperative hamstring strength was measured using a handheld dynamometer and radiological outcome was determined by postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).ResultsTwenty-seven patients with a mean age of 51.2 (± 12.6) years were available for follow-up at a mean of 41.11 (± 18.4) months. Patients state a mean of 10.6 (± 11.5) days in the unhealthy days (UHD) index and 88.9% show "good health" in the simple summary score (SSS). Mean subjective outcome scores were as follows: NRS 1.1 (± 2.4), mHHS 90.3 (± 14.8) and TAS 5.7 (± 2.2). A total of 59.3% RTPA and 88.9% state to be somewhat or very satisfied with their surgery. Mean interlimb strength ratio was 0.88 (± 0.21). MRI demonstrated a fully restored muscle-tendon unit, significantly greater fatty infiltration in the injured hamstrings (p = 0.009, d = 0.558), and a mean interlimb hamstring volume ratio of 0.94 (± 0.11). With respect to the 10% benchmark, patients had no significant asymmetries in muscle strength (p = 0.677, d = 0.084) or hamstring volume (p = 0.102, d = - 0.34). Correlation analysis revealed moderate correlation among asymmetries in strength and volume (p = 0.073, r = 0.373). In patients with the operated side inferior to the healthy side (n = 15), there was strong correlation among asymmetries in strength and volume (p = 0.002, r = 0.725). Statistically significant correlation was found between interlimb muscle volume atrophy and increase in fatty infiltration (p = 0.015, r = 0.481).ConclusionProximal hamstring repair results in good clinical outcome with satisfactory recovery of hamstring strength and volume. Interlimb asymmetries, in terms of muscle strength, fatty infiltration, and hamstring volume do not correlate with clinical outcome.Study TypeRetrospective cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.© 2025. The Author(s).

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.