• Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg · Jan 2025

    Letter Comparative Study

    Type B ankle fractures with additional medium-sized posterior fragment: mid-term functional and radiological outcome after fixation versus no fixation of the posterior fragment.

    • A L Franx, J M Hoogendoorn, TwissE L LELLDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands., P Krijnen, and S M Verhage.
    • Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. adriaanfranx@hotmail.com.
    • Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jan 24; 51 (1): 7979.

    PurposeGuidelines for treatment of medium-sized posterior fragments in trimalleolar fractures are scarce and show varying advice. Recent trials comparing fixation and no fixation of posterior fragments, show no difference in outcomes one year postoperatively. This study compares functional outcome and development of osteoarthritis in patients with fixation of a posterior malleolar fracture to patients without fixation of the posterior malleolus fracture.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients operated for type B ankle fractures with medium-sized (5-25% of joint surface) posterior malleolar fragments in a Dutch level-1 trauma center between 2014 and 2018. ORIF of posterior fragments (FIX) was compared to no fixation (NO-FIX). Choice of treatment was based on the surgeon's preference. Functional outcome was assessed using the AOFAS-score, OMAS-score and VAS-pain. Development of osteoarthritis was assessed on radiographs. A linear regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for worse functional outcome and osteoarthritis.Results27 patients were included in the FIX group and 58 patients in the NO-FIX group. After a median follow-up of 74 months (range 50-108), no difference was observed for functional outcome and pain (median AOFAS 90 vs. 95, OMAS 85 vs. 88, VAS-pain 1 vs. 1; all p > 0.05). Osteoarthritis rates were comparable (grade ≥ 2: 22% in FIX vs. 21% in NO-FIX, p = 0.87). Median fragment size was 15.7% versus 13.6% of the tibial articular surface after FIX and NO-FIX respectively. Median postoperative step-off on radiograph was 0.0 mm after FIX and 0.8 mm after NO-FIX (p = 0.20). Complication rates, including infection, secondary operation and hardware removal, were comparable. Postoperative step-off > 1 mm increased the risk of osteoarthritis (odds ratio 3.9, 95% CI 1.2-12.7).ConclusionThe value of fixation of medium-sized posterior fragments in type B ankle fractures seems limited after mid-term follow-up, although functional impairment caused by osteoarthritis might develop in the long-term. Because postoperative step-off > 1 mm increases the risk of osteoarthritis, restoration of the tibial plafond seems essential.© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.