-
Emerg Med Australas · Feb 2025
How useful was a paediatric physical abuse screening project in a rural Australian emergency department?
- John van Bockxmeer, Lesley Enzor, Marshall Makate, and Suzanne Robinson.
- Emergency Department, WA Country Health Service, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
- Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Feb 1; 37 (1): e70000e70000.
ObjectiveChildren with non-accidental injuries have increased risk of future death. There is insufficient evidence for widespread physical abuse screening tool use in the ED. This study assesses the utility of a physical abuse project that includes the implementation of a screening tool with case-matching from multiple sources. It aims to confirm whether risk-screening in a medium-sized rural Australian ED is reliable and will improve outcomes.MethodsThis is a 16-month ED retrospective pre-/post-implementation study of all injury, burn or poisoning cases 16 years and under during a paediatric physical abuse safety project which included a screening tool. Presentations with potential physical abuse were filtered by ICD-10 codes and reviewed. Multivariable logistic regression models compared pre- and post-implementation cases. Analyses examined outcomes, trends and interrogated the screening tool which formed a Clinical Pathway Algorithm (CPA).ResultsA total of 1469 presentations underwent investigation: 747 pre-implementation and 722 post-implementation. Pearson's χ2 test showed statistically insignificant differences. If tool used, documentation improved (odds ratio [OR] 7.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.91-12.18), child protection service referrals increased (OR 5.50; 95% CI 1.82-16.61) and hospital admissions decreased (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.22-0.79). Re-presentation rates stayed the same. Increased physical abuse was associated with screening factors including carer behavioural concerns, inadequate supervision, delayed presentation, repeat and unexplained injuries (ORs/CIs in an accompanying Table 4). Screening tool sensitivity was 62.3% and specificity 79.7%.ConclusionImplementing this ED paediatric physical abuse project improved safety behaviours and best-practice documentation. The tool improved medical decision making without increased re-presentations. ED clinicians may use similar CPAs to help review safety concerns and facilitate discharge; however, resources are needed to investigate referrals flagged due to false-positive rates.© 2025 The Author(s). Emergency Medicine Australasia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian College for Emergency Medicine.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.