• Arianne Cuff L Baker, Michael C Monuteaux, Paul C Mullan, Joshua Nagler, and Kate Dorney.
• From the Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, and Boston Children's Hospital Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston, MA.
• Pediatr Emerg Care. 2025 Feb 1; 41 (2): 869386-93.

ObjectivesClinical event debriefing (CED) improves healthcare team performance and patient outcomes. Most pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians do not receive formal training in leading CED. Our objectives were to develop a CED curriculum and evaluate its effect on performance, knowledge, comfort, and clinical practice.MethodsThis was a single group pre-post-retention study. We developed a hybrid curriculum with simulation, an interactive module, and individual feedback. We invited faculty and fellows from the PEM division of our hospital to participate. During an in-person training day, participants led standardized clinical simulation scenarios followed by simulated CED with immediate feedback on their leadership performance. They watched an interactive module between scenarios. Participants returned for a retention assessment 2-6 months later with a third simulation and debrief. Participants completed surveys measuring attitudes, experiences, and knowledge. Participants also evaluated the curriculum.The primary outcome was CED leadership performance using a novel 21-item tool that we developed, the Debrief Leadership Tool for Assessment (DELTA). A blinded, trained rater measured performance with DELTA. Secondary outcomes included changes in knowledge and comfort and changes in clinical practice.ResultsTwenty-seven participants enrolled and completed all parts of the curriculum and assessments. Debrief leadership performance improved by a mean of 3.7 points on DELTA pre-training to post-training (95% confidence interval = 2.7, 4.6, P < 0.01) and by 1.4 points from pre-training to retention (95% confidence interval = 0.1, 2.8, P = 0.03). Knowledge and comfort also significantly improved from pre-training to post-training and were sustained at retention. Most (67%) participants changed their clinical practice of CED after completing the curriculum. All participants would recommend the training to other PEM physicians.ConclusionsA hybrid simulation-based curriculum in leading CED for PEM physicians was associated with improvement in CED leadership performance, knowledge, and comfort. PEM physicians incorporated training into their clinical practice.Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

17 keywords...

hide…