• Win Sen Kuan, Irwani Ibrahim, Benjamin S H Leong, Swati Jain, Qingshu Lu, Yin Bun Cheung, and Malcolm Mahadevan.
• Emergency Medicine Department, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore and the Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Graduate Medicine School, Singapore. Electronic address: win_sen_kuan@nuhs.edu.sg.
• Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Mar 1; 67 (3): 367-378.e3.

Study ObjectiveThe noninvasive cardiac output monitor and passive leg-raising maneuver has been shown to be reasonably accurate in predicting fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. We examine whether using a noninvasive protocol would result in more rapid lactate clearance after 3 hours in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department.MethodsIn this open-label randomized controlled trial, 122 adult patients with sepsis and serum lactate concentration of greater than or equal to 3.0 mmol/L were randomized to receive usual care or intravenous fluid bolus administration guided by measurements of change of stroke volume index, using the noninvasive cardiac output monitor after passive leg-raising maneuver. The primary outcome was lactate clearance of more than 20% at 3 hours. Secondary outcomes included mortality, length of hospital and ICU stay, and total hospital cost. Analysis was intention to treat.ResultsSimilar proportions of patients in the randomized intervention group (70.5%; N=61) versus control group (73.8%; N=61) achieved the primary outcome, with a relative risk of 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 1.19). Secondary outcomes were similar in both groups (P>.05 for all comparisons). Hospital mortality occurred in 6 patients (9.8%) each in the intervention and control groups on or before 28 days (relative risk=1.00; 95% CI 0.34 to 2.93). Among a subgroup of patients with underlying fluid overload states, those in the intervention group tended to receive clinically significantly more intravenous fluids at 3 hours (difference=975 mL; 95% CI -450 to 1,725 mL) and attained better lactate clearance (difference=19.7%; 95% CI -34.6% to 60.2%) compared with the control group, with shorter hospital lengths of stay (difference=-4.5 days; 95% CI -9.5 to 2.5 days).ConclusionProtocol-based fluid resuscitation of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock with the noninvasive cardiac output monitor and passive leg-raising maneuver did not result in better outcomes compared with usual care. Future studies to demonstrate the use of the noninvasive protocol-based care in patients with preexisting fluid overload states may be warranted.Copyright © 2015 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

36 keywords...

hide…