• Chahnez Taleb, Gouvea BogossianElisaEDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. elisa.gouvea.bogossian@ulb.be., Carla Bittencour Rynkowski, Kirsten Møller, Piet Lormans, Manuel Quintana Diaz, Anselmo Caricato, Luigi Zattera, Pedro Kurtz, Geert Meyfroidt, Herve Quintard, Maria Celeste Dias, Angelo Giacomucci, Charlotte Castelain, Russell Chabanne, Pilar Marcos-Neira, Stepani Bendel, Ahmed Subhy Alsheikhly, Mohamed Elbahnasawy, Samuel Gay, Maximilian D'Onofrio, Konstantin A Popugaev, Nikolaos Markou, Pierre Bouzat, Jean-Louis Vincent, Fabio Silvio Taccone, and TRAIN Study Trial Group.
• Department of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
• Crit Care. 2025 Feb 7; 29 (1): 6767.

BackgroundThe optimal hemoglobin (Hb) threshold to trigger red blood cell transfusions (RBCT) in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients is unclear. This study evaluated the impact of liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategies on neurological outcome in patients with SAH.MethodsThis is a pre-planned secondary analysis of the "TRansfusion Strategies in Acute brain INjured Patients" (TRAIN) study. We included all SAH patients from the original study that were randomized to receive RBCT when Hb levels dropped below 9 g/dL (liberal group) or 7 g/dL (restrictive group). The primary outcome was an unfavorable neurological outcome at 180 days, defined by a Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score of 1-5.ResultsOf the 190 SAH patients in the trial, 188 (98.9%) had data available for the primary outcome, with 86 (45.3%) in the liberal group and 102 (53.6%) in the restrictive group. Patients in the liberal group were older than in the restrictive group, but otherwise had similar baseline characteristics. Patients in the liberal group received more RBCT and showed higher Hb levels over time. At 180 days, 57 (66.3%) patients in the liberal group and 78 (76.4%) in the restrictive group had unfavorable outcomes (risk ratio, RR 0.87; 95% confidence intervals, 95% CI 0.71-1.04). Patients in the liberal group had a significantly lower risk of cerebral ischemia (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.41-0.97). In a multivariate analysis, randomization to the liberal group was associated with a lower risk of unfavorable outcome (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99).ConclusionsA liberal transfusion strategy was not associated with a lower incidence of unfavorable outcome after SAH when compared to a restrictive strategy. However, in a multivariable analysis adjusted for confounders randomization to the liberal group was associated with lower risk of unfavorable outcome. The occurrence of cerebral ischemia was significantly lower in the liberal transfusion strategy group.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov number-NCT02968654 registered on November 16th, 2016.© 2025. The Author(s).

23 keywords...

hide…