• Clin Med (Lond) · Feb 2025

    Developing an electronic Surprise Question to predict end-of-life prognosis in a prospective cohort study of acute hospital admissions.

    • Baldev Singh, Nisha Kumari-Dewat, Adam Ryder, Vijay Klaire, Hannah Jennens, Kamran Ahmed, Mona Sidhu, Ananth Viswanath, and Emma Parry.
    • New Cross Hospital, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wednesfield Rd, Wolverhampton, UK, WV10 0QP; School of Medicine, Keele University, University Road, Keele, Staffordshire, UK, ST5 5BG. Electronic address: baldev.singh@nhs.net.
    • Clin Med (Lond). 2025 Feb 6: 100292100292.

    ObjectiveDetermining the accuracy of a method calculating the Gold Standards Framework Surprise Question (GSFSQ) equivalent end-of-life prognosis amongst hospital inpatients.DesignA prospective cohort study with regression calculated 1-year mortality probability. Probability cut points triaged unknown prognosis into the GSFSQ equivalent "Yes" or "No" survival categories (> or < 1-year respectively), with subsidiary classification of "No". Prediction was tested against prospective mortality.SettingAn acute NHS hospital.Participants18,838 acute medical admissions.InterventionsAllocation of mortality probability by binary logistic regression model (X2=6650.2, p<0.001, r2 = 0.43) and stepwise algorithmic risk-stratification.Main Outcome MeasureProspective mortality at 1-year.ResultsEnd-of-life prognosis was unknown in 67.9%. The algorithm's prognosis allocation (100% vs baseline 32.1%) yielded cohorts of GSFSQ-Yes 15,264 (81%), GSFSQ-No Green 1,771 (9.4%) and GSFSQ-No Amber or Red 1,803 (9.6%). There were 5,043 (26.8%) deaths at 1-year. In Cox's survival, model allocated cohorts were discrete for mortality (GSFSQ-Yes 16.4% v GSFSQ-No 71.0% (p<0.001). For the GSFSQ-No classification, the mortality Odds Ratio was 12.4 (11.4 - 13.5) (p<0.001) vs GSFSQ-Yes (c-statistic 0.72 (0.70 - 0.73), p<0.001; accuracy, positive and negative predictive values 81.2%, 83.6%, 83.6%, respectively). Had the tool been utilised at the time of admission, the potential to reduce possibly avoidable subsequent hospital admissions, death-in-hospital, and bed days was significant (p<0.001).ConclusionThis study has unique in methodology with prospectively evidenced outcomes. The model algorithm allocated GSFSQ equivalent EOL prognosis universally to a cohort of acutely admitted patients with statistical accuracy validated against prospective mortality outcomes.Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,704,841 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.