-
- Baldev Singh, Nisha Kumari-Dewat, Adam Ryder, Vijay Klaire, Hannah Jennens, Kamran Ahmed, Mona Sidhu, Ananth Viswanath, and Emma Parry.
- New Cross Hospital, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wednesfield Rd, Wolverhampton, UK, WV10 0QP; School of Medicine, Keele University, University Road, Keele, Staffordshire, UK, ST5 5BG. Electronic address: baldev.singh@nhs.net.
- Clin Med (Lond). 2025 Feb 6: 100292100292.
ObjectiveDetermining the accuracy of a method calculating the Gold Standards Framework Surprise Question (GSFSQ) equivalent end-of-life prognosis amongst hospital inpatients.DesignA prospective cohort study with regression calculated 1-year mortality probability. Probability cut points triaged unknown prognosis into the GSFSQ equivalent "Yes" or "No" survival categories (> or < 1-year respectively), with subsidiary classification of "No". Prediction was tested against prospective mortality.SettingAn acute NHS hospital.Participants18,838 acute medical admissions.InterventionsAllocation of mortality probability by binary logistic regression model (X2=6650.2, p<0.001, r2 = 0.43) and stepwise algorithmic risk-stratification.Main Outcome MeasureProspective mortality at 1-year.ResultsEnd-of-life prognosis was unknown in 67.9%. The algorithm's prognosis allocation (100% vs baseline 32.1%) yielded cohorts of GSFSQ-Yes 15,264 (81%), GSFSQ-No Green 1,771 (9.4%) and GSFSQ-No Amber or Red 1,803 (9.6%). There were 5,043 (26.8%) deaths at 1-year. In Cox's survival, model allocated cohorts were discrete for mortality (GSFSQ-Yes 16.4% v GSFSQ-No 71.0% (p<0.001). For the GSFSQ-No classification, the mortality Odds Ratio was 12.4 (11.4 - 13.5) (p<0.001) vs GSFSQ-Yes (c-statistic 0.72 (0.70 - 0.73), p<0.001; accuracy, positive and negative predictive values 81.2%, 83.6%, 83.6%, respectively). Had the tool been utilised at the time of admission, the potential to reduce possibly avoidable subsequent hospital admissions, death-in-hospital, and bed days was significant (p<0.001).ConclusionThis study has unique in methodology with prospectively evidenced outcomes. The model algorithm allocated GSFSQ equivalent EOL prognosis universally to a cohort of acutely admitted patients with statistical accuracy validated against prospective mortality outcomes.Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f370b/f370b44d1a004df56edc8267f91b4a82cdb5a705" alt="alt text"
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.