• Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand · Dec 2010

    Review

    Prevalence of postpartum urinary incontinence: a systematic review.

    • David H Thom and Guri Rortveit.
    • Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
    • Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Dec 1;89(12):1511-22.

    Objectiveto investigate the prevalence of urinary incontinence within the first year postpartum.Designa systematic review of population-based studies.Populationgeneral female populations up to 1 year postpartum.Methodsstudies on incontinence in population-based sample defined as from one or more district hospitals or from multiple clinics covering a defined geographic area. Studies of women from a single outpatient clinic or who were referred for care (e.g. for being high risk) were excluded. In addition, studies had to have a sample size of over 100 participants and a response rate 50% or over.Main Outcome Measuresprevalence from individual studies as well as mean prevalence is given. Pooled prevalence is estimated for non-heterogenous studies.Resultsduring the first 3 months postpartum, the pooled prevalence of any postpartum incontinence was 33% (95% confidence interval (CI) 32-36%) in all women. The mean prevalence of weekly and daily incontinence was 12% (95% CI 11-13%) and 3% (95% CI 3-4%), respectively. The mean prevalence was double in the vaginal delivery group (31%, 95% CI 30-33%) compared to the cesarean section group (15%, 95% CI 11-18%). Longitudinal studies within the first year postpartum showed small changes in prevalence over time.Conclusionsthe prevalence of postpartum incontinence was high. Prevalence was substantially less for more frequent incontinence. Urinary incontinence after cesarean section was half the prevalence after vaginal delivery.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.