• Masaki Maruyama, Daniel D Palomo, and Andreas A Ioannides.
• Laboratory for Human Brain Dynamics, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wakoshi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan. mmasaki@brain.riken.jp
• Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Jan 1;30(1):147-62.

AbstractThe luminance contrast of a visual stimulus is known to modulate the response properties of areas V1 and the human MT complex (hMT+), but has not been shown to modulate interactions between these two areas. We examined the direction of information transfer between V1/V2 and hMT+ at different stimulus contrasts by measuring magnetoencephalographic (MEG) responses to moving and stationary stimuli presented centrally or peripherally. To determine the direction of information flow, the different response latencies among stimuli and hemispheres in V1/V2 was compared with those of hMT+. At high contrast, responses to stimulus motion and position began in V1/V2, and were followed in hMT+ with a delay between 34 and 55 ms. However, at low contrast, lateralized responses in hMT+ came first, with those in V1/V2 lagging with a delay of 27 ms. Also, at high contrast, stationary stimuli produced greater responses than motion stimuli in V1/V2, while the reverse was true in hMT+, whose response lagged behind the initial response in V1/V2. The same activation order was found using Mutual Information Analysis of the response variances for each condition. Here, the response variances in hMT+ mimicked and trailed those of V1/V2 at high contrast, whereas the reverse was true at low contrast. Such consistent interactions found using two different methodologies strongly supports a processing link between these two areas. The results also suggest that feedback from hMT+ for low-contrast stimuli compensates for unresolved processing in V1/V2 when the input of a visual image is weak.(c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

31 keywords...

hide…