• J. Heart Lung Transplant. · Dec 2011

    Donor quality of life in living-donor lobar lung transplantation.

    • Mai Nishioka, Chie Yokoyama, Mitsua Iwasaki, Michiko Inukai, Naomi Sunami, and Takahiro Oto.
    • Lung Transplant Unit, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
    • J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Dec 1;30(12):1348-51.

    BackgroundLiving-donor lobar lung transplantation has been established as a life-saving option for end-stage pulmonary diseases. However, factors associated with quality of life (QOL) of living lung donors have not been fully investigated.MethodsA cross-sectional study was performed at Okayama University using the version 2 questionnaire of the 36-item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey. Linear regression analysis was used to estimate the relationship of donor factors and recipient outcomes using the SF-36 component summary scores.ResultsOf 65 donors, 42 (65%) agreed to participate in this study; the mean age was 42 ± 1 (range 25 to 59) years. Mean time from the operation to questionnaire was 39 ± 4 (range 1 to 78) months. Donor-recipient relationships were as follows: sibling (18 cases); spouse (9 cases); parent (11 cases); and child (4 cases). Thirty-four of 42 donors were paired with those who donated their organ to the same recipient. Both physical and mental health scores in donors were higher than those in the general Japanese population. Lower mental health scores were seen in those who donated to their child or parent. There was a significant correlation in mental health scores between the paired donors. In the univariate analysis, donor age (r = -0.35, p = 0.02), donor-recipient relationship (r = 0.38, p = 0.01) and recipient death (r = -0.42, p = 0.006) were factors significantly associated with donor mental health scores.ConclusionsThe average QOL in the living lung donors was better than that of the general population. However, a fatal outcome in the recipient significantly impacted donor mental health QOL. Ensuring that donor candidates consider both the risks/benefits of donation, and the potential recipient outcomes may be critical in the informed consent process.Copyright © 2011 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…