• Sophie Böttcher-Haberzeth, Thomas Biedermann, Clemens Schiestl, Fabienne Hartmann-Fritsch, Jörg Schneider, Ernst Reichmann, and Martin Meuli.
• Department of Surgery, Tissue Biology Research Unit, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
• Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2012 Feb 1;28(2):171-7.

PurposeDermal templates, such as Matriderm® and Integra®, are widely used in plastic and reconstructive surgery, often as two-step procedures. A recent development is the application of thin dermal templates covered with split thickness skin grafts in one-step procedures. In this experimental study, we compare the two thin matrices Matriderm® 1 mm and Integra® Single Layer in a one-step procedure with particular focus on neodermis formation.MethodsMatriderm® 1 mm and Integra® Dermal Regeneration Template-Single Layer (1.3 mm) were compared in a rat model. In three groups of five animals each, a full thickness wound was covered with (a) Matriderm® 1 mm and neonatal rat epidermis, (b) Integra® Single Layer and neonatal rat epidermis, or, (c) neonatal rat epidermis only (control). Histological sections 2 weeks post transplantation were analyzed with regard to take of template and epidermis, neodermal thickness, collagen deposition, vascularization, and inflammatory response.ResultsTake of both templates was complete in all animals. The Matriderm®-based neodermis was thinner but showed a higher cell density than the Integra®-based neodermis. The other parameters were similar in both matrices.ConclusionThe two templates demonstrate a comparable biological behavior early after transplantation. The only difference was found regarding neodermal thickness, probably resulting from faster degradation of Matriderm®. These preliminary data suggest that both dermal templates appear similarly suitable for transplantation in a one-step procedure.

27 keywords...

hide…