• Clin Neurophysiol · Nov 2013

    Clinical Trial

    Neurophysiological evidence of differential mechanisms involved in producing opposing and following responses to altered auditory feedback.

    • Weifeng Li, Zhaocong Chen, Peng Liu, Baofeng Zhang, Dongfeng Huang, and Hanjun Liu.
    • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
    • Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Nov 1;124(11):2161-71.

    ObjectiveWhen hearing perturbations in voice auditory feedback, people produce responses that mostly oppose the perturbation direction, whereas a few responses follow the direction of feedback perturbation. The causes of opposing and following responses, however, remain poorly understood. The present event-related potential (ERP) study sought to examine the neurophysiological processing of opposing and following responses to pitch feedback perturbations during self-monitoring of vocal production.MethodTwelve Mandarin-native speakers participated in the experiment. Vocal and neurophysiological responses to pitch perturbations (± 50 and ± 200 cents) in voice auditory feedback were measured. Individual-trial responses were categorized according to the response direction and then separately averaged in groups of opposing and following responses. ERPs indexed by the P1-N1-P2 complex corresponding to two types of vocal responses were also obtained.ResultsOpposing and following vocal responses did not differ in the magnitude, but there were greater proportions of opposing to following responses to 50 cents stimuli. The amplitude and latency of the P1 and N1 components showed none of significance across conditions, whereas there was a direction × magnitude effect on the P2 response. Following responses elicited greater P2 amplitudes than opposing responses only when pitch feedback was perturbed for downward 200 cents, and upward pitch perturbation elicited greater P2 amplitudes than those with downward direction only in the production of opposing responses.ConclusionThese findings demonstrate that cortical processing of opposing responses is different from that of following responses, which can be modulated by the physical properties of feedback perturbation.SignificanceDifferent neural mechanisms are involved in the production of opposing and following responses to feedback perturbations during self-monitoring of vocal production.Copyright © 2013 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…