• R A Dyer, K Camden-Smith, and M F James.
• Department of Anaesthesia, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, South Africa.
• Can J Anaesth. 1992 Mar 1;39(3):220-5.

AbstractThe purpose of this investigation was to compare the analgesic actions and side-effects of a 50 micrograms epidural bolus of sufentanil and 50 micrograms epinephrine, with a control group receiving saline and epinephrine. The method employed was a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial involving 40 ASA I or II patients for total abdominal hysterectomy. All received 1.5% lidocaine with 1/200,000 epinephrine epidurally before operation, until a block to T4 was established. Patients were anaesthetised, their tracheas were intubated, and they were allowed to breathe spontaneously before administration of the test drug. Results showed that sufentanil prolonged the duration of local anaesthesia (198 +/- 35 min vs 174 +/- 29 min; P less than 0.05), and of analgesia (288 +/- 85 min vs 188 +/- 42 min; P less than 0.01). There was an increase in somnolence in the sufentanil group (9/20 vs 2/20; P less than 0.05). Glycopyrollate was given to 11/20 patients in the sufentanil group vs 1/20 in the control group (P less than 0.01) following bradycardia and hypotension. Clinical respiratory depression occurred in the sufentanil group; 5/20 patients required controlled ventilation following apnoea greater than 20 sec. It is concluded that epidural sufentanil causes considerable cardiorespiratory depression in the setting of general anaesthesia, and should be used with caution in the spontaneously breathing, anaesthetised patient.

41 keywords...

hide…