-
- Adri T Apeldoorn, Henk Bosselaar, Tanja Blom-Luberti, Jos W R Twisk, and Gustaaf J Lankhorst.
- Rehabilitation Department, Medical Centre Alkmaar, The Netherlands. a.t.apeldoorn@mca.nl
- Spine. 2008 Apr 1;33(7):821-6.
Study DesignAn observational prospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo determine the reliability of nonorganic sign-testing in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), and to identify determinants of diagnostic disagreement.Summary Of Background DataFor the assessment of behavioral responses to examination, Waddell et al published "the Waddell score" in 1980. The Waddell score consists of 8 nonorganic signs, divided into 5 categories. The overall score is positive if at least 3 of the categories are scored positive. Although the Waddell score is widely used, little is known about its reliability.MethodsTwo observers examined 126 consecutive patients with CLBP referred for rehabilitation. Cohen's kappa was used to compute the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the sign maneuvers, categories and Waddell score. Cronbach's alpha was calculated for the 5 categories and 8 signs to determine internal consistency. Chi2 tests were applied to determine the possible influence of clinical characteristics on interobserver reliability.ResultsInterobserver reliability varied from 0.33 to 0.74 for the sign maneuvers and categories, and was 0.48 and 0.49 for the overall Waddell score. Intraobserver reliability varied from 0.43 to 0.84 for the sign maneuvers and categories, and was 0.65 and 0.68 for the overall Waddell score. Internal consistency varied from 0.65 to 0.72 for the categories and from 0.71 to 0.78 for the signs. Determinants of diagnostic disagreement did not exceed levels of significance (P < 0.05).ConclusionFor trained observers of a population of patients with CLBP in a rehabilitation setting, the interobserver reliability of the Waddell score was moderate and the intraobserver reliability was good. No influence of clinical characteristics was found on interobserver reliability. To optimize the homogeneity and variability of the Waddell score, we recommend summing up the individual signs instead of summing up the categories.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.