• Miriam Kunz, Parvaneh Mohammadian, Bertold Renner, Stephan Roscher, Gerd Kobal, and Stefan Lautenbacher.
• Physiological Psychology, Otto-Friedrich University , Bamberg , Germany and.
• Somatosens Mot Res. 2014 Jun 1;31(2):100-10.

UnlabelledAbstract Background: Chemo-somatosensory evoked potentials (CSSEPs) elicited by chemical stimulation (CO₂ gas) of the nasal mucosa have been shown to be sensitive enough to pick up even weak analgesic effects. With the present study we wanted to investigate whether CSSEPs are also a sensitive tool to capture endogenous pain inhibitory mechanisms elicited by conditioned pain modulation (CPM; where a first conditioning stimulus reduces the sensitivity for a second test stimulus) with a conditioning stimulus of rather low noxious load.MethodsSeventeen healthy participants were tested for CPM effects (conditioning stimulus: tonic heat pain with intensities around the pain threshold induced via a thermode; test stimulus: chemonasal stimulation (73% and 78% CO₂)) on CSSEPs and on self-report ratings.ResultsWe found significant CPM effects in the CSSEPS, with reduced amplitudes and prolonged latencies at several electroencephalogram (EEG) recording positions when using the lower CO₂ concentration (73% CO₂). In contrast to the visible inhibitory effects on the CSSEPs, subjective ratings of the test stimulus did not reflect CPM action.DiscussionThe experimental pain model using CO₂ stimuli to elicit CSSEPs proved to be sensitive enough to capture weak CPM effects elicited by a conditioning stimulus of rather low noxious load. The usage of such mild noxious conditioning stimuli-in contrast to stimuli of higher noxious load (e.g., cold pressor test)-has the advantage that the activation of other types of pain inhibitory mechanisms in parallel (like attentional distraction, stress-induced analgesia) can be avoided.

21 keywords...

hide…