• Ann Emerg Med · Feb 1994

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Suprapubic bladder aspiration versus urethral catheterization in ill infants: success, efficiency and complication rates.

    • C V Pollack, E S Pollack, and M E Andrew.
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
    • Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Feb 1;23(2):225-30.

    Study ObjectiveTo compare success rates, complications, and efficiency of suprapubic bladder aspiration with urethral catheterization in ill infants.DesignProspective, randomized clinical study.SettingThe pediatric emergency department at the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson.ParticipantsConvenience sample of infants under 6 months of age requiring an uncontaminated urine specimen for the evaluation of febrile illness, suspected urinary tract infection, or sepsis. Infants with wet diapers were excluded.InterventionsPatients were randomized to undergo timed suprapubic bladder aspiration (performed by a physician and a nurse) or urethral catheterization (performed by two nurses). If suprapubic bladder aspiration was unsuccessful, urethral catheterization was performed immediately and the bladder was drained; emptying volume was recorded. All patients had a next-void "bag" urinalysis performed for post-procedure hematuria.ResultsFifty patients underwent primary suprapubic bladder aspiration. The success rate (defined by obtaining at least 2 mL of urine) was 46%. Mean +/- SD time per successful suprapubic bladder aspiration was 16.73 +/- 7.73 seconds. Fifty patients underwent primary urethral catheterization. The success rate was 100%; the mean time required was 80.70 +/- 46.52 seconds. After failed suprapubic bladder aspiration, urethral catheterization was 100% successful, with a mean draining volume of 2.95 +/- 2.38 mL. No immediate problems were identified among any instrumented patients; later complications (next-void hematuria after either procedure, other visceral injury with suprapubic bladder aspiration) were not detected.ConclusionBoth suprapubic bladder aspiration and urethral catheterization afford the emergency physician low-risk access to uncontaminated urine in ill infants. Suprapubic bladder aspiration is less efficient in that it requires physician participation and failure rates are higher. These data suggest that successful suprapubic bladder aspiration is primarily dependent on the volume of urine in the bladder; thus, in the ill or febrile ED infant who may be dehydrated, the likelihood of success decreases. The authors recommend that ED nursing and physician staff become comfortable with performing urethral catheterization on infants.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.