• Brian M Ilfeld, Timothy E Morey, and F Kayser Enneking.
• Department of Anesthesiology, P. O. Box 100254, 1600 Archer Road, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0254, USA. bilfeld@ufl.edu
• Anesthesiology. 2004 Feb 1;100(2):395-402.

BackgroundIn this randomized, double-blind study, the authors investigated the efficacy of continuous and patient-controlled ropivacaine infusions via an infraclavicular perineural catheter in ambulatory patients undergoing moderately painful orthopedic surgery at or distal to the elbow.MethodsPreoperatively, patients (n = 30) received an infraclavicular perineural catheter and nerve block. Postoperatively, patients were discharged home with both oral analgesics and a portable infusion pump delivering 0.2% ropivacaine (500-ml reservoir) in one of three dosing regimens: the basal group (12 ml/h basal, 0.05-ml patient-controlled bolus dose), the basal-bolus group (8 ml/h basal, 4 ml bolus), or the bolus group (0.3 ml/h basal, 9.9 ml bolus). Investigators and patients were blinded to random group assignment.ResultsThe basal group (n = 10) required more oral analgesics than the basal-bolus group (P = 0.002) and had a shorter median infusion duration than the other two groups (P < 0.001 for both). The bolus group had the longest median infusion duration (P < 0.001 for both) but experienced an increase in breakthrough pain incidence (P = 0.004) and intensity (P = 0.04 vs. basal-bolus group) as well as sleep disturbances (P < 0.001 for both) compared with the other groups. Overall satisfaction was greatest in the basal-bolus group (9.7 +/- 0.5 vs. 7.9 +/- 1.7 and 8.1 +/- 1.5; P < 0.05 for both).ConclusionsAfter moderately painful orthopedic surgery at or distal to the elbow, 0.2% ropivacaine delivered as a continuous infusion combined with patient-controlled bolus doses via an infraclavicular perineural catheter optimizes analgesia while minimizing oral analgesic use compared with basal- or bolus-only dosing regimens.

21 keywords...

hide…