• N D Clement, D MacDonald, and A H R W Simpson.
• Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK, nickclement@doctors.org.uk.
• Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Aug 1;22(8):1933-9.

PurposeThe aim of this study was to identify the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Oxford knee score (OKS) and Short Form (SF-) 12 score after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsProspective pre-operative and 1 year post-operative OKS and SF-12 scores for 505 patients undergoing a primary TKA for osteoarthritis were collected during a one-year period. Patient satisfaction with their (1) patient relief and (2) functional outcome was used as the anchor questions. Their response to each question was recorded using a 5-point Likert scale: excellent, very well, well, fair, and poor. Simple linear regression was used to calculate the MCID for improvement in the OKS and physical component of the SF-12 score according to the level of patient satisfaction with their pain relief and function.ResultsThe OKS improved by 15.5 (95 % CI 14.7-16.4) points and the SF-12 physical component score improved by 10.1 (95 % CI 9.1-11.2) points for the study cohort. The level of patient satisfaction with their pain relief and function correlated with the improvement in the OKS (r = 0.56; p < 0.001, and r = 0.56; p < 0.001) and the physical component of the SF-12 score (r = 0.51; p < 0.001, and r = 0.60; p < 0.001), respectively. The MCID for the OKS was 5.0 (95 % CI 4.4-5.5) and 4.3 (95 % CI 3.8-4.8) points and for the physical component of the SF-12, it was 4.5 (95 % CI 3.9-5.2) and 4.8 (95 % CI 4.2-5.4) points for pain relief and function, respectively.ConclusionThe MCID identified for the OKS and SF-12 physical component score after TKA is the best available estimate and can be used to power studies and ensure that a statistical difference is also recognised by a patient.

18 keywords...

hide…